On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, Eric Germann wrote: > You also have the sporadic people who say "for whatever reason, I said > something on NANOG I shouldn't have because now that I am unemployed from a > dot bomb, when I try to get a job, they search the web and these stupid > posts I made show up in your archive and can you remove them so I can get a > job???" I explain to them the concept of an an archive. > > Whats the collective voice of NANOG say, keep it or kill it?
I think we're all big boys (and girls) here and understand that subscribing to a large, archived mailing list will get your subscription address on yet another "1,000 MILLION EMAIL ADDRESSES" CD. I should hope everyone here can implement, or at least ask for, basic spam filtering. This isn't your grandmother's crochet chat group; everyone here should be smart enough to at least glance at the Merit site before subscribing. If you come in here and say things that make you unattractive as a prospective employee, tough crap. :) More jobs for the rest of us. Charles > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > > Leo Bicknell > > Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 10:32 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: answerpointe.cctec.com] > > > > > > > > Has anyone else gotten one of these? It appears they are trolling > > a Nanog archive on the web and sending these out to posters. *sigh* > > > > Perhaps it should be a nanog AUP violation to archive the list on > > the web, and merit could keep a single web archive with the e-mail > > addresses removed / altered to prevent this sort of harvesting. > > > > -- > > Leo Bicknell - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - CCIE 3440 > > PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/ > > Read TMBG List - [EMAIL PROTECTED], www.tmbg.org > > > >
