Stephen J. Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My impression of most of these people is that they are very clever, > and unless you post something here that is really brilliant thinking > the chances are these guys can come up with most of the ideas > themselves.
When Blaster hit back on Aug 11, I remembered an earlier NANOG post that I saw: Subject: Re: Microsoft.com attack? On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Adam Maloney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was just thinking the other day, wouldn't it be funny if there was a > worm that had infected machines attack windowsupdate.microsoft.com so > you couldn't patch? :) Despite the windowsupdate.microsoft.com vs windowsupdate.com difference, the paranoid side of me thinks that this was more than coincidental... -Sounil
