on 9/24/2003 9:30 PM Drew Weaver wrote:
> I know you all have probably already thought of this, but > can anyone think of a feasible way to run a RBL list that does not have > a single point of failure? Or any attackable entry? Easy. Have the master server only be reachable by replication partners through a VPN connection, and have dozens of secondaries advertising through multiple anycast addresses. -- Eric A. Hall http://www.ehsco.com/ Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
