On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 09:51:08AM -0700, Mike Batchelor wrote:
> --On Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:18 PM -0500 Justin Shore
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Joel Perez wrote:
> >
> >>So back to my ACL's I go!
> >
> >This is one of the most likely things to happen. DNS RBLs are effective.
> > Otherwise spammers wouldn't be targeting them for abuse.
>
> What evidence is there that spammers are the ones doing the DDoS?
There is likely some conjecture here, but aside from the DNS RBLs
that cause collateral damage (ie: blacklisting large chunks
of address space to cause behaviour change) who has something to gain
from these dnsbl's going down?
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
