> > Anyone who doesn't think that's an operational issue, just wait until it > > bites you on the ass. > > Now we have clear evidence that there are no less than three who > understand the threat.
My first thought was that the DDoS was a means of obscuring access to patches for other vulnerabilities that might be simulatenously exploited. I'm assuming, though not certain, that Cisco would have alternative distribution/communication/update channels in such an event, but is that indeed the case? -ed ----------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
