Owen DeLong wrote: > > This will not likely affect point-to-point line-of-site communications above 50Mhz. > It will likely affect non-terrestrial communications and HF communications depending > on ionospheric reflection. > > Owen Ummm... http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/solarsystem/cell_phone_020306.html 900 mhz and 1800 mhz. And facing East or West. And Satellite, somewhat above 2.0 ghz. And a significant number of ISPs are currently employing 802.11 2.4 and 5.0+ ghz equipment for last mile links (Proxim Tsunami) and Motorola Canopy gear. There are also warnings regarding parts of the power grid. However, fair warning. Perhaps Sean Donelan knows more? NK6S -- Rodney Joffe CenterGate Research Group, LLC. http://www.centergate.com "Technology so advanced, even we don't understand it!"(SM)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communicatio... Tomas Lund
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communicatio... Robert Mathews
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communicatio... Bob Snyder
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communi... Kevin Loch
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communicatio... Chris Yarnell
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communi... Roy
- Re: NOAA warning for rf com... Todd Vierling
- Re: NOAA warning for rf... ed
- RE: NOAA warning fo... Kevin Bednar
- Re: NOAA warning for rf... Owen DeLong
- Re: NOAA warning fo... Rodney Joffe
- Re: NOAA warni... Anton L. Kapela
- Re: NOAA warning fo... Keptin Komrade Dr. BobWrench III esq.
- Re: NOAA warni... Marshall Eubanks
- Re: NOAA w... Eric Kuhnke
- Re: NOAA warni... Todd Vierling
- Re: NOAA warning for rf com... Scott Granados
- Re: NOAA warning for rf... Owen DeLong
- Re: NOAA warning fo... Scott Granados
- RE: NOAA warning for rf communicatio... Graham, Darel R.
- RE: NOAA warning for rf communicatio... Graham, Darel R.
