Re: [arin-announce] IPv4 Address Space (fwd)

[Petri Helenius]

Matthew Kaufman wrote:

End-to-end requires that people writing the software at the end learn about
buffer overruns (and other data-driven access violations) or program using
tools that prevent such things. It is otherwise an excellent idea.
 

There is supposedly some magic going into this in the next "Service 
Pack" of a mentioned
major exploding Pinto. Not sure if it�s just flipping the joke of 
firewall on by default or something
more comprehensive/destructive like non-executable stack. Or a 
completely new invention like
bug free code :-)

Unfortunately, the day that someone decided their poorly-designed machine
and operating system would be safer sitting behind a "firewall" pretty much
marked the end of universal end-to-end connectivity, and I don't see it
coming back for a long long time. Probably not on this Internet. IPv6 or
not.
 

Last I checked most "firewall"s don�t make these machines safe, it might 
make them safer,
so only two out of three malwares hit them. Does not really help too much.

Combine that with ISP pricing models (helped by registry policy) that
encourage <=1 IP address per household, and the subsequent boom in NAT
boxes, and the fate is probably sealed. 

 

Here I�ve observed opposite trend, most ISP�s are getting rid of NATting 
because it�s failure
prone and expensive to implement and keep running.

Pete