On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 01:17:26PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Does anybody honestly think companies will commit the capex needed to > > implement IPv6? > Not without additional benefits. We need either applications that are > working a lot better at ipv6 or we may yet have to see ipv4 space ran out > before it becomes clear to everybody that ipv6 is a must.
imagine a network without NAT. I stopped counting applications
that are struggling/breaking with NAT...
But many people still believe rfc1918 and NAT are a cool thing
because they just got used to it...
tschuess
Stefan
--
Stefan Mink, Schlund+Partner AG (AS 8560)
Primary key fingerprint: 389E 5DC9 751F A6EB B974 DC3F 7A1B CF62 F0D4 D2BA
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
