At 9:51 PM -0500 11/26/03, Sean Donelan wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, David Lesher wrote:Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered: > My company is investigating the use of wireless in a couple of our > conference rooms. Aside from limiting the scope of reception with various > directional antennae, does anyone have any suggestions or pointers for > other ways to limit the propagation of signals (i.e. special shielding > paint, panels or other wall coatings)?
As I told Andy, you need a "RayProof" or similar brand shielded conference room. This is Faraday Cage, with a tight-fighting door, etc.
Uhm, dumb question. If it is that important, why are you using wireless at all? Why not install a cheap switch/hub in the middle of the conference table and let people plug a patch cord from the hub to their laptops?
Stupid pen-test tricks, instead of using an expensive WiFi scanner and cracking WEP; often you can collect better intelligence with a radio turned to the frequency used by wireless lapel mics used by executives during briefings.
Or by lecturers forgetting them as they went to the bathroom. I only did that once.
