Petri Helenius writes on 12/4/2003 5:36 PM:


Yup. The model can be extended to "if no rDNS, and if spamtrap hits or other spammish behavior noted from more than X IPs per /24, then block the /24".

And why would blocking the /24 be appropriate instead of matching the registry?

I would refer you to the huge number of netblocks out there that stay at /16 or larger size, with the upstream not SWIP'ing or otherwise delegating netblocks in APNIC (or wherever, such as an rwhois server) as they provision IPs.


        srs
--
srs (postmaster|suresh)@outblaze.com // gpg : EDEDEFB9
manager, outblaze.com security and antispam operations

Reply via email to