You're correct in saying that OOO messages from Exchange are offensive. However, I don't think you should necessarily consider the subscriber as the offender - I for one have no choice in what email software is run at my corporate office. Everyone in my corporate IT group is so busy continually justifying their existence and staking their ground that there's no chance that they'll switch platforms.
Heck, the Windoze guy turns almost white when I talk about taking over the DNS servers. -----Original Message----- From: David Lesher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 26, 2003 9:51 AM To: nanog list Subject: Re: Out of office/vacation messages Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered: > > > > Again, if your auto-responder writes to *anyone*, it is broken, period. > > Then again, most of the autoresponders being sent to the list are from > Exchange. Which is broken, period. Most? Not "all"?? When/if I get tired of getting the admin box full of such, I find unsubscribing the offender to be a good cure. -- A host is a host from coast to [EMAIL PROTECTED] & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
