> * Are they breaking anti-UCE filters by doing this? (yes) How? They own example.com. If UCE happens to contain a forged sender of roble.com, would you consider that even remotely useful in a filter? Why should example.com be any different? they will likely never use the domain name, so probably wouldn't care if you feel the need to blacklist it explicitly, for that matter.
> Roger Marquis > Roble Systems Consulting > http://www.roble.com/ -- Ray Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
