> Forcing it through a server doesn't automagically add the ability to throttle > abusive behavior. It's merely the obvious sledgehammer fix.
It's a means to deal with smtp traffic. > Now consider a router that's instrumented to collect flow data, feeding a > real-time system that throttles the port if something abusive happens. You get > the same benefits of not having to read and act on abuse reports, plus you > don't break non-abusive uses of the network. Where is something like this documented and explained? Adi
