Owen
--On Tuesday, April 20, 2004 14:54 -0400 James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
now let me take a bite at this :P
i can see this 'attack' operational against a multihop bgp session that's not md5'd.
now the question is... would this also affect single-hop bgp sessions? my understanding would be no, as single-hops require ttl set to 1.
-J
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 01:36:09PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
http://www.uniras.gov.uk/vuls/2004/236929/index.htm
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike
-- If this message was not signed with gpg key 0FE2AA3D, it's probably a forgery.
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
