On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Niels Bakker wrote: > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephen J. Wilcox) [Thu 22 Apr 2004, 16:11 CEST]: > > There isnt a "link-local" for IP altho this would be a great solution > > (surely this can be written for BGP??). > > 169.254/16
is not link-local and will be routed if you try. i was thinking link-local as in ISIS style > > Or I could use all eBGP addresses from a block which I dont route and filter > > internally.. I suspect this is a non-starter, I will have to include all my > > addresses given to me by peers and its gonna screw traces, monitoring etc. > > I've seen e.g. BT do this and public peering? or when viewed from their peers networks..? Steve > > > -- Niels. >
