William B. Norton wrote:



For those who say things like "can't define 'junk' precisely", I would agree, but I think we also can agree that we all have a general idea of what junk is. Just looking for round #'s really. It isn't 0%, and it isn't 90% (although it seems that way sometimes).

I would also agree that it would be valuable for the community to track this # over time. You can't manage it if you can't measure it.

There is also a lot of "background Internet radiation" coming from p2p applications which seem to remember their peers for a week or two. These usually account for most of the unidirectional traffic knocking on doors unanswered. (not counting large DDoS).

Pete



Reply via email to