On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Bob Snyder wrote:

> Of course, since you're doing this based on email that NAC sent, who has
> been enjoined from "directly or indirectly" preventing the customer from
> using their IP space, you may be opening NAC up to further liability.

Of course, using this line of reasoning, NACs original email to the list
could easily be argued to be an indirect intervention.  If I were the TRO
holder, and my announcement started to become a new bogon, I'd be at the
judges doorstep with the entire NANOG thread in my hand :-/

//Alif

Reply via email to