> Paul Vixie wrote: > or, to put it in terms you can all understand: > "why does that provider's upstream still have bgp peers?"
Maybe said upstream does not want to deal with TROs and legal issues? CWS is not illegal as of today. > if you give people the means to hurt you, and they do it, > and you take no action except to continue giving them the > means to hurt you, and they take no action except to keep > hurting you, then one of the ways you can describe the > situation is "it isn't scaling well." Could not agree more. Michel.
