i'd said: > > wrt the mit paper on why small ttl's are harmless, i recommend that > > y'all actually read it, the whole thing, plus some of the references, > > rather than assuming that the abstract is well supported by the body.
someone asked me: > Would you happen to have the URL for the MIT paper? I meant to keep it > to read at a latertime, but it seems I deleted the message. http://nms.lcs.mit.edu/papers/dns-imw2001.html
