On 07/26/04, Gerald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/07/22/HNmicrosoftid_1.html
>
> Does it strike anyone else as odd that they would be encouraging the use,
> but not have SPF setup yet for the primary domains they are known for yet?
From that article: 'Sender ID is a proposed technology standard,
backed by Microsoft, for verifying an e-mail message's source. It
combines two previous standards: the Microsoft-developed "Caller
ID," and the Meng Weng Wong-developed SPF.'
Here's Hotmail's Caller ID record:
_ep.hotmail.com text = "<ep xmlns='http://ms.net/1'
testing='true'><out><m><indirect>list1._ep.hotmail.com</indirect><indirect>list2._ep.hotmail.com</indirect><indirect>list3._ep.hotmail.com</indirect></m></out></ep>"
http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/twc/privacy/spam_senderid.mspx
--
J.D. Falk "...one of the worst signs of our danger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is we can't imagine the route
from here to utopia."
-- Kim Stanley Robinson
