This all reminds me of an old Neal Stephenson quote from a piece he did for Wired back 
in the day.  There are more cables and a few more landing stations these days, but on 
the bottleneck side not much has changed

"In defense of telephony people, it must be pointed out that they are the ones who 
really know the score when it comes to sending bits across oceans. Netheads have heard 
so much puffery about the robust nature of the Internet and its amazing ability to 
route around obstacles that they frequently have a grossly inflated conception of how 
many routes packets can take between continents and how much bandwidth those routes 
can carry. As of this writing, I have learned that nearly the entire state of 
Minnesota was recently cut off from the Internet for 13 hours because it had only one 
primary connection to the global Net, and that link went down. If Minnesota, of all 
places, is so vulnerable, one can imagine how tenuous many international links must 
be. 

Douglas Barnes, an Oakland-based hacker and cypherpunk, looked into this issue a 
couple of years ago when, inspired by Bruce Sterling's Islands in the Net, he was 
doing background research on a project to set up a data haven in the Caribbean. "I 
found out that the idea of the Internet as a highly distributed, redundant global 
communications system is a myth,'' he discovered. "Virtually all communications 
between countries take place through a very small number of bottlenecks, and the 
available bandwidth simply isn't that great.'' And he cautions: "Even outfits like 
FLAG don't really grok the Internet. The undersized cables they are running reflect 
their myopic outlook.'' 

On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 13:53:37 BST, Carlos Friacas said:

> if yes, here we see once again the "benefits" of having a monopoly in the
> telecom industry. and a bad one it seems... even if the incumbent is the
> only way out of the island, it would seem wise (not cost-driven) to have a
> second cable at least connecting the island to the world... ;-)

And make sure the two landing stations are on opposite sides of the island.

But even then you can't win - I seem to recall that Sri Lanka has a small
problem with rebels - who could conceivably end up controlling one of
the stations.....

Reply via email to