On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 17:56:42 -0400, Joe Abley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The proposal (which comes from APNIC members, not from APNIC staff) > concerns non-portable addresses assigned to end-users. I don't know > about anybody else, but I've never had any luck getting a response from > people in that category anyway; it's invariably the upstream ISPs who > respond (if anybody does), and there is no suggestion that their > contact details will be able to be hidden. > > So what difference will it make? Effectively none. APNIC has always served out unverified and obvious garbage from their whois servers. What I find offensive is that they are now codifying this lack of cooperation, and tacit complicity with spammers and other anonymous miscreants as official policy. matto
