On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 02:13:17PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote: > there are a lot of organizations now having PI without having an ASN > and beeing multihomed. a transition to v6 with this policy would make > things much worse for them, so why should they?
Agreed, but currently we are at "no PI for anybody but ISPs". How about first solving the PI-denial problem for those who technically need it? "Convenience PI holders" are a different problem space as you don't have to account for routing in solving it. > on the other hand, 1 ASN -> 1 v6 prefix does not necessarily mean 1 v6 > prefix -> 1 ASN. might work out. Exactly. Regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
