> Instead of hacking the nice and working TCP we have now you should
> move on to greener grass and use $xyzzy instead.  It does what you
> want, at least in the specification.  I don't know how many
> implementors have managed to code it properly.

i remember hearing folks tell vj and mk that when they wanted to speed
up tcp.  only the value of $xyzzy changes with time; the flat-earth
mentality of the enclosing community seems to be a constant.

> You see?

no, i think we're shouting past each other at this point, so let's stop.

Reply via email to