Because then the specificity of the routes would become less relevant. If you have two highways available to you, then it's 6 of one and half dozen of another. You could care less which way you go.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Iljitsch van Beijnum Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 7:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: 'NANOG list' Subject: Re: Sensible geographical addressing [Was: 16 vs 32 bit ASNs yadda, yadda] On 30-nov-04, at 23:32, Scott Morris wrote: > At large NAP points (the higher order ISP's) this may make some sense > because of the ubiquity of larger scale lines. Why would geographical aggregation need bigger lines?
