Guys, join SPAM-L and duke it out. nanog is supposed to be networking issues. Which a runaway spam reporting problem is most likely not.
+------------------------- + Dave Dennis + Seattle, WA + [EMAIL PROTECTED] + http://www.dmdennis.com +------------------------- On Sun, 26 Dec 2004, Joe Provo wrote: > > > Folllowups elsewhere - this isn't nanog fodder kids. > > On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 08:56:42PM -0800, David A. Ulevitch wrote: > > There is nobody behind the wheel at The World and they continue > > to send out this odd anti-spam spam. > > Wrong and wrong; there are definitely clues at the helm, and it > sure appears to be a user from offered evidence. As a matter of > fact the OWNER and OPERATOR of the site said as much in mail that > was forwarding in response to your first thrashing about on the > matter. See http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/msg03630.html > > > Some folks emailed me privately to suggest the emails are coming > > from one of their users but I believe this is not the case. > > Repeated assertions of beliefs does not transmogrify them into > facts. People who insist on making nanog [or some other public > fourm] their first stop on an troubleshooting chain will find > themselves wildly disappointed. In this case, see the FAQ for > more aappropriate places to spew. > > Joe > > -- > RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE >
