Andrew Brown wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 07:21:55PM +0100, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:Thus justifying those who load their NS and corresponding NS's A records with nice long TTL
On 16.01 12:46, William Allen Simpson wrote:
A quick survey of some caching servers in my neighborhood reveals thatThis fellow is pretty confused, as from here (Michigan via Merit) the------- Forwarded Message
From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I don't see what you are looking at - .net and .com point to the same place with no indication of anything awry...of course, I'm late to the game and the DNS probably tells a different story...
DNS has pointed to different places since yesterday.
some of them return "old/correct" A RRs for panix.com at this time.
presumably they have cached ns records from before the switch in the com tld zone.
At least those whose caches' your still in will still talk to you after your registrar screws you.
(OT
Limiting named cache size could have an adverse effect for people hoping to cash into this inusurance. Shouldnt cache limiting kill low priority records such as A's which do not correspond to cached NS first....
)
