On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 10:28 +1100, Bruce Tonkin wrote: > Interestingly, the ICANN equivalent in Australia (auDA), does > pro-actively enforce policies, and even took Capital Networks to court > on the basis that they could be de-accredited as a registrar for .au, if > they continued not to allow transfers for .com. > > See: > > http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2004/324.html > > The original judgment is at: > > http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/federal_ct/2004/808.html > > yes they did. now pacnames in another country supposedly bought capital... at least they are allowing you to transfer away this time though
auDA being proactive is good...now its time icann is...
