On 02/19/05, Steve Gibbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd been waiting to hear that the nanog-futures list had actually been
> created before urging that this discussion move there. Since it sounds
> like it has been, now would probably be a good time to move the
> discussion.
*agree*
There still needs to be a formal announcement, for those who may
be interested but are ignoring this thread. I'll leave that to
the current governors, though, 'cause it's not my place.
--
J.D. Falk uncertainty is only a virtue
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> when you don't know the answer yet
