On 02/19/05, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Sean Donelan:
>
> > Yet another reason for supporting port 587 on your servers for remote
> > authenticated mail submission from your users. If you don't support
> > port 587, and use SPF, it may break when AOL or other providers re-direct
> > port 25.
> >
> > http://www.heise.de/english/newsticker/news/56437
>
> Has AOL notified anyone in advance? Quite a few provider-independent
> mail providers were caught by surprise.
Is there a mailing list that will reach all/most of these
provider-independent mail providers?
(If so, then that's where we should be having this discussion
asking why they don't support port 587 yet.)
--
J.D. Falk uncertainty is only a virtue
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> when you don't know the answer yet
