On Sun, 2005-03-06 at 09:12 -0800, JC Dill wrote: > The important thing is to determine which RFCs are being implemented, > and why. > > <http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=2756>
:-) Not that I am defending Juniper, but it seems to me that their response "that the RFC wasnʼt serious" is an indicator that they did in fact get the "joke", however they didn't want to reply in a jovial fashion. -Jim P.
