This is straying a bit far from network operations, and would probably be better discussed elsewhere.
-Steve On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Dave Dennis wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Micah McNelly wrote: > > > > > Actually I got a response quickly from a list member who represent sorbs > > at some level. Do you really think opinion has a place in mail > > delivery? What if the USPS decided any magazine you subscribed to was > > suddenly unfit for delivery and decided it should blocked (thrown away)? > > > > /m > > > > Well, anyone remember the Comstock Act? > > But seriously, the analogy here is a bit false. It would be like > the recipient of the mail signed up to use a service that inspected > their mail for them, and made the decisions you are describing. > > You can argue that signing up for such a service is silly, wrong headed, > ill informed and results in unintended consequences. But you cannot argue > that it is government censorship. > > +------------------------- > + Dave Dennis > + Seattle, WA > + [EMAIL PROTECTED] > + http://www.dmdennis.com > +------------------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Steve Gibbard [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 415 717-7842 (cell) http://www.gibbard.org/~scg +1 510 528-1035 (home)
