* Bill Woodcock: > On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Florian Weimer wrote: > > Yes, the selection of criteria could be biased. Or Telcordia compared > > apples and oranges when it compared Verisign's 100 ms to DENIC's > > 200�ms (or what the actual numbers where). > > Yeah, I was a little curious about the composition of the latency > number as well... [...] But I'd certainly be curious as to their > actual methodology.
It's described in the report. Basically, their comparison is based on the submitted proposals. Telcordia did conduct site visits, but did not perform any network measurements. The latter would have been impossible anyway because some of the proposed infrastructure does not exist yet.
