On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 03:02:06PM -0500, Joe Provo wrote: > On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 11:45:16AM -0800, Bill Woodcock wrote: > > ...the "reformed" NANOG list moderation committee seems to suffer > > foolishness somewhat more gladly than the old regime. Could we have a > > little more backbone in the moderation, please? I don't want to be > > reading about crackers until this time next year. > > I have as much humour as the next guy, but [insert renewed call for > nanog-chat or nanog-social or whatever would keep the chitchat in a > different blasted bucket]. Heck, if this is the general bucket than > can we please have an actual -tech where the non-gibberish belongs? > > If randy can tell me how to preemptively configure filter recognition > for 'chitchat', then I'll send him some cookies. No points for > reactive, since that is the present mode.
You don't have a 'Kill Thread' button? Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] Designer Baylink RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates The Things I Think '87 e24 St Petersburg FL USA http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274 If you can read this... thank a system administrator. Or two. --me
