yeah, I agree. this is one of the cases where they "suck more" and I hoped that folks would be able to use the info to make an educated guess as to who might suck less.
I'm kind of crazy like that. The last time I tried to warn off unwitting consumers, I ended up spending $50k on legal fees defending myself. http://goldengatevw.com/ For some reason, it think its worth it, but most folks seem to think its off topic and stupid. I give up. matto On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Randy Bush wrote: > My apologies. Apparently I was mistaken when I thought that other > network operators might be interested in saving themselves the time > and money of buying a broken piece of network equipment, which the > manufacturer won't support. is there any other kind of networking equipment? even the best of the vendors says "we suck less." the internet is about building a scalable reliable network out of unreliable components. unfortunately, most vendors seem to have taken as license. randy [EMAIL PROTECTED]<darwin>< The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke
