[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whether Karl is in fact right or a raving net.loon, there is indeed something very wrong with the process if he's 25% of the input.
It may be useful to keep in mind that this is the tail end of a long process that we're talking about here. There was already a lot of discussion about this in the RIR regional forums when the policy was being developed, so far from being symptomatic of a problem I think that the lack of controversy here is a good sign that the system works.
FWIW,
Doug
--
If you're never wrong, you're not trying hard enough
