On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Andy Johnson wrote:
> > Alex Rubenstein wrote: > > What possible technical issue could exist that to don't have to wire the > > dslam to a pots splitter? > > > > Actually, even if they did wire it to a pots splitter, and there was no > > pots line present, it'd still work. > > > > My speculation is that their billing/accounting system is based on a > POTs number, and since these customers will not need one, they will have > administrative errors managing accounts. that'd be unfortunate, what with number portability and all, yes?
