Well, the first thing any engineer worth their saly would ask in a situatin such as this is "Were any changes implemented, concurrent with the appearance of these problems, which would have possibly account for this?"
This problem has fairly wide-spread implications, it would appear, and the lack of technical information on it is rather alarming... - ferg -- Matt Larson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Randy Bush wrote: > i don't think this > > roam.psg.com:/usr/home/randy> doc -p -w worldnic.net > Doc-2.1.4: doc -p -w worldnic.net > Doc-2.1.4: Starting test of worldnic.net. parent is net. > Doc-2.1.4: Test date - Mon Apr 25 14:20:45 HST 2005 > ;; res_nsend: Protocol not supported > DIGERR (UNKNOWN): dig @a.gtld-servers.net. for NS of worldnic.net. failed > ;; res_nsend: Protocol not supported > DIGERR (UNKNOWN): dig @b.gtld-servers.net. for NS of worldnic.net. failed > > is the worldnic problem, but could be. but it is a problem. a.gtld-servers.net and b.gtld-servers.net have AAAA records. Some applications and stacks try the v6 address first if it's available and will appear to hang if you don't have v6 connectivity. That may very well be what's happening here. Matt -- Matt Larson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> VeriSign Naming and Directory Services -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
