On Sat, 30 Apr 2005, Dean Anderson wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote: > > > So agreeing for a second with Dean that indeed this behaviour would appear > > to be > > prohibited or at least inconsistent with the RFCs, the fact is anycast is > > widely > > deployed and is proven to be stable. > > "vixie-cast" is deployed on around 60 or so root DNS servers. (don't know > the exact number) That covers a wide spread of root DNS servers, but I > wouldn't call that 'widely deployed'. I haven't been able to find any > users of HTTP anycast/'vixie-cast' that Patrick Gilmore referred. There
we do this 'http anycast' as part of another service... it seems to work well enough.
