On 5/3/05 7:21 PM, "Todd Vierling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> If you check, I think you'll see that he actually said "ultradns's >> anycast for .ORG is completely coherent". > > And last time I checked -- on this list, mind you -- it certainly was not. If you want to be taken seriously, perhaps you might want to research the use of the term coherency in terms of DNS. Or not. Hint: It doesn't mean that one node responds and another doesn't. Rodney Joffe CenterGate Research Group, LLC http://www.centergate.com "Technology so advanced, even WE don't understand it"(R)
- Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited (fwd) Todd Vierling
- Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited (fwd) Edward B. Dreger
- Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited Rodney Joffe
- Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited Todd Vierling
- Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited (fwd) Edward B. Dreger
- Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited (fwd) Patrick W. Gilmore
- Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited (fwd) Edward B. Dreger
- Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited (fw... Patrick W. Gilmore
- Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited (fwd) Nicholas Suan
- Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited (fwd) Patrick W. Gilmore
- Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited (fwd) Nicholas Suan
- Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited (fwd) Paul Vixie
