On Tue, 3 May 2005, Edward B. Dreger wrote: > > When anycast gets _really_ interesting is when an anycasted client makes > a request [from an anycasted address] to an anycasted server.
Why would anyone use an anycast address as a client? Wouldn't it be simpler to make all client connections from the machine's unicast address? Tony. -- f.a.n.finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR GOOD.
