On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On 13/07/05, Chris Cappuccio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
He doesn't say that the IETF ignored him. That's not accurate. He
clearly says that the IETF did not care. There's a difference. The
issues were not considered important enough to fix by the IETF (as
the problems lie in the basic ICMP specifications.)
As for his claims about the Cisco manager, nobody called him a
terrorist, that's outright absurd. Read more carefully. What they did was
Some pointers to IETF threads would be great
Look for "" at TCPM WG archives at
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/current/index.html
There have been multiple threads on the subject -- look for "ICMP".
In the last 5 months, the following messages have generated message
thread(s).
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/current/msg01026.html
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/current/msg01018.html
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/current/msg01066.html
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/current/msg01111.html
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/current/msg01185.html
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/current/msg01210.html
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
