The "nanog problem" was clearly stated. It had nothing to do with the specific discussion, but more that the discussion contained instances where folks were being insulting and crude.
Tim Rainier Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/02/2005 03:39 PM To "Chris Ranch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc Bjørn Mork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Christopher L. Morrow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[email protected]> Subject RE: "Cisco gate" and "Meet the Fed" at Defcon.... > But the vulnerability applies for only ipv6-enabled devices... > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20050729-ipv6.shtml the general problem is definitely wider than the v6 hole. i believe, but of course could be wrong, that the april fix was a bit wider than v6. the blackhat/nanog problem is that, if we are not allowed to discuss these things openly, all is conjecturbation. randy
