On 8/3/05, Robert E. Seastrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> > We should all be looking to the security auditing work done by
> > the OpenBSD team for an example of how systems can be
> > cleaned up, fixed, and locked down if there is a will to do so.
> 
> Beer, unsupported assertions, and lack of rigorous audit methodology
> can be blended together to make one's code more secure?

what unsupported assertions? The project's record speaks for itself.
Don't confuse Theo's lack of social graces with a lack of polish on
the project he leads (a common mistake).
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED],darkuncle.net} || 0x5537F527
    encrypted email to the latter address please
    http://darkuncle.net/pubkey.asc for public key

Reply via email to