On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 11:51:53AM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Sabri Berisha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > > With the use of anycast DNS servers on the internet, TCP is no > > longer an option for DNS. > > Erm, bollocks. > > Just because a few nameservers are anycasted doesn't mean that the > vast majority of non-anycasted servers may not use TCP.
Oh I can't agree with that more. No problem in using tcp for non-anycasted servers.. > Optimising the common case of simple lookups so they fit in a UDP > request makes good sense, but an overzealous determination to stamp > out TCP DNS is not helpful, since it is rather useful under certain > circumstances. I agree here, -- Sabri Berisha, Juniper Certified - JNCIA #747 | Cisco Certified - CCNA email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | cell: +31 6 19890416 http://www.cluecentral.net/ | http://www.virt-ix.net/
