Paul Jakma wrote:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
I think I only felt the need to do this a handful of times over the
last decade, but it's generally difficult to position tcpdump such
that it will intercept the eBGP traffic.
Ok. So that's a "not important" then.
I'm interested in operational use of any kind of passive BGP 'reader'
btw - not just ethereal/tcpdump. (Just to make it obvious ;) ).
IMO it is very important to have the ability to listen into a BGP
stream at any point in time and have the reader decode the updates/
withdrawls starting from the next message boundary.
--
Andre
