So this is all well and good while some measure of V6 is tunneled, but
one should be wondering what these games of chicken mean to V6 when it
is native. Given that most organizations won't meet the qualifications
to be multi-homed, stunts like this will have a greater impact then
this one is having today. Doesn't exactly leave a warm fuzzy that the
current direction for IPv6 services is sane....
David
On Oct 5, 2005, at 12:08 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 06:01:15 -0400, Richard A Steenbergen
proclaimed...
I guess the earlier reports of (3)'s lack of testicular fortitude may
have
been exagerated after all. :)
Luckily, many of us have ipv6 tunnels that managed to help us get
around
this. See, ipv6 has a purpose, afterall! :-)
