On Oct 15, 2005, at 9:08 PM, Paul Vixie wrote:
but when similar things were proposed
at other meetings, somebody always said "no! we have to have end-to- end,
and if we'd wanted nat-around-every-net we'd've stuck with IPv4."

Hmm.

Is VJ compression considered a violation of the "end-to-end" principle?

Or perhaps I misunderstand (yet again).

Rgds,
-drc

Reply via email to