On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 02:24 -0700, Owen DeLong wrote: <SNIP> > 3. Most multihoming today is done using BGP, but, many other > solutions exist with various tradeoffs. In V6, there is > currently only one known (BGP) and one proposed, but, > unimplemented (Shim6) solution under active consideration > by IETF. (this may be untrue, but, it seems to be the > common perception even if not reality).
As for "multihoming" in the sense that one wants redundancy, getting two uplinks to the same ISP, or what I have done a couple of times already, multiple tunnels between 2 sites (eg 2 local + 2 remote) and running BGP/OSPF/RIP/VRRP/whatever using (private) ASN's and just providing a default to the upstream network and them announcing their /48 works perfectly fine. The multihoming that people here seem to want though is the Provider Independent one, and that sort of automatically implies some routing method: read BGP. Greets, Jeroen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
