On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Steven M. Bellovin wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sean Donela > n writes: > > > >On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Blaine Christian wrote: > >> We are talking about an infrastructure that does not lend itself very > >> well to market forces. In many places FFTH and/or DSL from a single > >> carrier are becoming the only options. I would not count a 500ms > >> satellite hop as an option <grin>. > > > >The cable industry claims 97% of the households passed in the US. Why > >don't you consider it an option? > > > Do they claim to pass 97% with two-way cable? The cable industry claims 91% of households passed with two-way cable.
- Re: [Latest draft of Internet regulation bill] Sean Donelan
- Re: [Latest draft of Internet regulation bill] Blaine Christian
- RE: [Latest draft of Internet regulation bill] Michael Hallgren
- Re: [Latest draft of Internet regulation bill] Jared Mauch
- Re: [Latest draft of Internet regulation bill] Steven J. Sobol
- Re: [Latest draft of Internet regulation bil... Jared Mauch
- Re: [Latest draft of Internet regulation bill] Bill Stewart
- Re: [Latest draft of Internet regulation bill] Owen DeLong
- What do we mean when we say "competition?&q... David Barak
- Re: What do we mean when we say "compet... Matthew Crocker
- Re: What do we mean when we say "co... David Barak
